Schools use various methods to try and increase grades. What are the different methods they use? Which one is the most effective?
To reach higher achievement, stakeholders in the schools need to enhance the facilities and hire the qualified teachers to hold learning process. Having modern amenities are considered effectively to increase children understanding, but without guidance from the professional ones, such development could not be applicable.
Using standardized amenities and hiring expert teachers are feasible ways to boost children’ grades. When learning systems are associated with advanced technology and completed equipment in the laboratory, the satisfying during this process could be gained. When the teachers master in their subjects, they are capable in interpretation and association into the real situation leading the students to acquire comprehensive understanding. For example, the baffling theory of what kind of energy that atomic particles have is no longer exist since the implementation of the set experiment tool, and with the help, a teacher who is expert in modern physics scope, the reasons behind this phenomenon is obviously displayed and explained. Therefore, these methods would give excellent results, if the school can adapt properly.
Admittedly, the support of a professional teacher is the core of the learning process. However, using modern facilities are better to improve critical thinking which is important to prevent the students in spoon-feed learning and to develop their thinking by synthesis practical data and theory simultaneously. Nevertheless, the majority of such process could succeed without guidance from the tutor as the wrong approach used by students will cause a worse impact in their insights. For example, when students are left doing experiment with no introduction and supervision from teachers, they might collect unwillingness data and even the broken tools is likely to occur as proper rules do not follow by them. Therefore, if the schools cannot present these two aspects, having qualified teachers will a good choice to improve overall value.
In conclusion, although developing school service in terms of advanced technology and better laboratory equipment increase students’ achievement, without valuable explanation from teachers, it will be worthless. In fact, schools should put qualification of the tutor as the most priority, and providing regular training for them is one way to meet this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | Rana partap singh | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | Indri Eka Putri | 84 | view |
- International sporting events such as the Olympic Games and the Football World Cup provide an outlet for patriotic feelings and help reduce international tensions.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for the urban population in different world regions. 84
- The charts below show the number of French adults whose parents spoke a French regional language to them when they were children and the number who speak a French regional languange to their own children 77
- The groups below show the trends in three boys and girls names which are currently popular in the UK 79
- The chart below show the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...the qualified teachers to hold learning process. Having modern amenities are considered...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7264957265 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10829475019 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6738340805 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.571428571 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155384627887 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483604168348 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357075061517 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086571155403 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161108947698 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.