The scientist believes that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is a positive while others think it is a negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion

Nowadays, machines plays a crucial role in everyone's life. It is true that sciencetist think that machine will become more smart than humankinds. While, some believe that it is a positive development and i personally believe that it is a negative development.

One of the main beneficial developments, of machines is that the work or task completed by machines is more accurate and efficient. For example on computers a person want to calculate the high amount data in few seconds than manually. Secondly, the venturesome and multiple task can be performed by machines and robots like mining and space exploration and so on. Additionally, many activities are performed by artificial intelligence in one time period without easelessly and tirelessly unlike human beings. Eventually, it is pivotal in crime field as well. With the aid of cctv cameras, criminals will detect easily.

On the other hand despite, having some advantages there are several drawbacks of machines. It create a loss of balance in society. Because, machine replace humans and more people rely on machines which leads to umemployment. A recent survey showed that 60% people become unemployed due to the advancement in technology and more rely on machines in factories. Furthermore, people with negative attention can wreak a havoc on others by altering the software machines. For instance a hackers mislead the information or stolen the money in others account without any permission. If humans will become more dependant on machines then they will definately suffer from these problems.

In conclusion, there have been ongoing debate whether the machines is more acumen than humans or not. But, its their negativity like (umemployment , costly )is more than its postivity.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive development and i personally believe that it is a negative development. On...
^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...e are several drawbacks of machines. It create a loss of balance in society. Because, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a hacker' or simply 'hackers'?
Suggestion: a hacker; hackers
...ing the software machines. For instance a hackers mislead the information or stolen the m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... others account without any permission. If humans will become more dependant on ma...
^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
... permission. If humans will become more dependant on machines then they will definately s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...is more acumen than humans or not. But, its their negativity like umemployment , c...
^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more acumen than humans or not. But, its their negativity like umemployment , cos...
^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... its their negativity like umemployment , costly is more than its postivity.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32129963899 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93904043827 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0852302257 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.8888888889 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3888888889 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94444444444 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274038842727 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769227024675 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710575464194 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169426238784 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728164255472 0.056905535591 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.