Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Artificial intelligence has taken over mankind in every aspects in this decade. Therefore, a majority of scientists believe that self-operating vehicles will become the main transportation for people in the near future. There are several reasons why the scientists have made this prediction. However, I believe this technology advance brings more negativity to human life.
To begin with, the prediction of self-driven cars in the future is existed for a few reasons. Since the appearance of the first computing unit, professional engineers have vastly improved this simple unit and pushed the new functions into almost every daily aspects which include transportation. Hence, the idea of cars that are driven by computers is predicted undoubtedly. Furthermore, there pioneers in this field who actually succeeded in bringing this type of cars into reality. For example, Tesla is one of the first corporations to invent automatic smart cars that absolutely require no control from the driver.
However, the development of intelligent vehicles still has a big setback. Although this technology has come to a new milestone, there are still circumstances where human’s control is needed. For instance, when facing a smaller object on the road in lowlight conditions, computers cannot calculate whether such object is a person or not. Thus, with the program functioned to protect driver, the car will continue to slam over that obstacle, which would result in a different way if a man was behind the wheel. Moreover, if the outbreak of hand-free cars happens, more and more people will become jobless in the future which creates new massive problem for the authorities.
In conclusion, there is no doubt why scientists predict that cars will no longer need human’s control in the future. However, this development does not seem to bring a favor to human’s daily life.
- Foreign tourists should be charged more than local people when visiting cultural and historical attractions in that country To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Some people think that criminals should be given long term in prison, so as to reduce to crime rate. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many people say that the only way to guarantee a good job is to complete a course of university education. Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work. How far do you agree or disagree with the above 78
- Some people believe that employment over the age of 60 is not right and creates lots of problems. So people should retire after 60 and not work.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 91
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letter•explain the reasons for the noise•apologise•describe what action you will take 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... over that obstacle, which would result in a different way if a man was behind the wheel. Moreover...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96684777466 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4943177625 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190425754969 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653959884055 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598038827023 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117971358677 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240547110861 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.