Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree?
Punishing disreputable criminals by incarceration is a topic debated by a number of people in the recent years. In my opinion, the administrations are adviced to equip offenders with educational programs and job training.
It is believed that ethical education and employment training for trespassed persons are the most appropriate approaches to facilitate the process of rehabilitation. Firstly, education with empathy is the pivotal factor in changing positively the offenders’ attitudes towards the society. Being comprehensively educated, wrongdoers will be able to understand the fundamental social disciplines and the sense of remorse, hence striving to be recognized as respectable citizens ultimately. Furthermore, criminals will find social reintegration and pursuing careers less difficult thanks to the thorough preparation for occupations. To clarify, providing job training for individuals who used to be burglars or robbers because of economic inadequacy would help them earn a sustainable living when coming back to the society, thus obviously mitigating the likelihood to relapse.
That is not to say behavioral education and job training is always effective to the wrongdoers. For instance, instead of taking the psychological remedies, offenders committed felonies such as terrorists or murderers will go to any lengths to escape and continue their infamous businesses eventually. By using rigorous measures such as incarceration or even capital punishment, those notorious individuals will be deprived from freedom forever, hence decreasing the probability of further recidivism.
In conclusion, the authorities should provide the proper education and job training or rigorous treatment for criminals basing on the seriousness of the conviction rather than imprisonment without any assessment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | lonbimthoi | 78 | view |
- IN MANY COUNTRIES, PEOPLE CAN GET A WIDE VARIETY OF FOOD TODAY AS A RESULT THEY EAT FOOD FROM OTHER REGION THAN THE LOCAL FOOD. DO U THINK THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. 89
- SOME PEOPLE THINK MEDICAL CARE SHOULD BE FREE FOR EVERYONE, WHILE OTHER THINK THEY SHOULD PAY MEDICAL COST FOR THEMSELVES. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW AND GIVE YOUR OPINION. 84
- SOME PEOPLE THINK IT’S NECESSARY TO TRAVEL ABROAD TO LEARN ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES. HOWEVER, OTHER THINK IT’S NOT NECESSARY TO TRAVEL ABROAD BECAUSE ALL OF THE INFORMATION CAN BE SEEN ON TV AND THE INTERNET. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, OPINION? 100
- SOME COUNTRIES ACHIEVE INTERNATIONAL SPORTING SUCCESS BY BUILDING SPECIALIZED FACILITY TO TRAIN TOP ATHLETES INSTEAD OF PROVIDING SPORT FACILITY THAT EVERYONE CAN USE. DO U THINK IT’S NEGATIVE/POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT? 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07335907336 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42766692998 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65250965251 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8434084858 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158679814201 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602182714263 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04849889977 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946200034032 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282228305589 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.