Sending criminals to prison is not the effective method to deal with them. Education and job training should be used instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that to make people who have done crimes can change into good citizens, we should let them immigrate to the community by helping them find jobs or getting education. Personally, I completely partly agree with this point of view, and this essay will give suitable answers and examples.
The first thing to improve my opinion is that by providing criminals a good job, teaching them about laws so they can understand. This helps them feel less lonely and encourages them to move forward since everybody does not stay away from them. For example, when a prisoner comes out from prison, if he or she is welcomed by the community and helped him or her to find a job, this will reduce the risk he or she makes a crime again. In addition, if we just throw all people who are criminals into prisons, prisons might not contain all and this creates hatred in them, who may try to escape prison then do crimes until getting caught. Therefore, governments need to educate these people so they can understand their wrong actions so they will follow rules and avoid using prohibited items such as drugs. For instance, when prisoners have education, they feel confident to look for a job and build relationships with the community, which does not make them stay alert and open mind to help these prisoners.
On the other hand, in some situations, we still can not use this method to aid criminals who do not feel regret or sad when doing bad things, these bad people must be locked inside prison and never go outside freely. As an example, serious killers who murder people, these criminals must suffer live in prison for their entire life or an exucation penalty to pay their fault since if we let these people free, they can be a huge threat to the community.
In conclusion, helping criminals learn and find a job is a good solution to reduce the crime rate effectively. However, we still must use harsh punishment to those who do not understand their wrongs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-11 | buiminhduc | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-28 | Frank Chen | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that a person improves their intellectual skills with a group of people more than by doing personal activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 73
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games What are the negative impacts of playing games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...n addition, if we just throw all people who are criminals into prisons, prisons might n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63793103448 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4020651044 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57183908046 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3680924775 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205958137529 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791871620375 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265973025719 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124627576896 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242738033594 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.3001002004 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.