Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
We are living in the Internet century, people communicate via multiple methods with the most common languages to speed up their connections. In the meantime, some minority languages face the risk of disappearance due to lack of usage by their native speakers. Some citizens suggest their governments should prioritize preventing further languages from dying, meanwhile, others deny that solution to save budget.
On the one hand, there are strong reasons to think that using the national budget to protect those languages from dying out. Firstly, languages are human heritages because they are often the only way to convey a community’s songs, poems… Secondly, languages also have the capacity of expressing unique cultural characteristics due to the fact that without languages, the cultures itself disappear. Another aspect that makes nurturing languages stand out is that they can give insight into neurology, psychology and linguistic capacities of our species. For example, unlike English speakers who use only 'You' and 'I' in a dual conversation, Vietnamese speakers use various words to call the listeners upon on their relationships.
On the other hand, the budget to protect the minority languages is quite costly. The first prominent justification is that language's loss, like species loss because it is simply a fact of life on the planet. Furthermore, the number of people who speak the rare languages almost live far apart from the world. In addition, their younger generations aim to reach to the developed countries or areas, by studying most dominant languages like English.
To summarize, for the above reasons, although preventing the minority languages is costly and challenging, it seems to me that governments should invest to revive those languages even after actually going extinct to protect the diversity of cultures, species and heritage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-06 | Pardeep66144 | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditures of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 76
- Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- These days people in some country are living in a “throw-away” society which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away. Causes and problems. 78
- Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides. 67
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
...e first prominent justification is that languages loss, like species loss because it is s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48275862069 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92507304501 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9512510469 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154658641188 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562369011444 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327730519981 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942384464141 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182967393357 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.