Should the international community do more to tackle the threat of global warming?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Global warming is an overwhelming problem the world is facing every day. Temperatures have risen dramatically during the last decades because of our incorrect beliefs. By polluting the air with carbonic anhydride and sulfuric acid we have corrupted the atmosphere.
We can easily agree that this problem is caused mainly by today’s big companies, such as plastic manufacturers, petroleum refineries and more. They create a huge amount of toxins which are emitted into air every day. Such substances are endangering the climate by producing of the tragically famous “Serra effect”, which has led us to a rise of temperatures.
These companies, in my opinion, should be stopped or at least regulated in a better way. The international community is the only one which can do it. In fact every single state has not the will to block such industries because they are creating lot of wealth.Therefore it would be counterproductive for its people to close them. World organizations could help in this way, because they are the only ones that have the authority to obligate every country to obey international rules.
So, international community has to do much more to overcome the problem of global warming. In the last few years, it has introduced lot of laws for preventing temperature rises, but no one has respected them. All the states of the United Nations have promised more than one time that something would have been changed, but nothing happened. In my opinion international community has to be more severe and start to introduce huge fines to punish disrespectful countries.
In conclusion, something has to be changed to prevent temperature rises, and it can be done just by world organizations. In this sense lots of laws has been written from many countries, but almost no one followed them.
- Many people believe that increasing levels of violence on television and in films is having a direct result on levels of violence in society Others claim that violence in society is the result of more fundamental social problems such as unemployment How m 61
- Many people believe that increasing levels of violence on television and in films is having a direct result on levels of violence in society Others claim that violence in society is the result of more fundamental social problems such as unemployment How m 61
- Should the international community do more to tackle the threat of global warming Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Many people believe that increasing levels of violence on television and in films is having a direct result on levels of violence in society Others claim that violence in society is the result of more fundamental social problems such as unemployment How m 56
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...because they are creating lot of wealth.Therefore it would be counterproductive for its p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...because they are creating lot of wealth.Therefore it would be counterproductive for its p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...an be done just by world organizations. In this sense lots of laws has been writte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, as to, at least, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12794612795 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07079936656 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1556274235 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110918395613 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412319703378 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521438104923 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566256147339 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457241367776 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.