Should self-driving cars be legal?
Back to the 1900s, if we mentioned about an autonomous moving car to the society, the only thing that came up to their mind would be irrational or supernatural. At the time being, when the advanced technology is gradually developing, we manage to bring self-driving cars from science-fiction into life. However, magnificent as it may sound, this brand-new invention leads to numerous consideration since it can be operated without drivers. Therefore, it must be illegal to own a self-driving car due to three main factors.
First of all, it costs a lot of money to make robotic cars widely available. The government, for instance, must spend a huge amount of budget to promulgate laws for the new transportation, build roads or other infrastructures such as automatic gas station and charger booth. In developing countries, taxes are expected to improve the living standard of citizens rather than investing on glamorous technology. Moreover, since it contains a different controlling system, these cars will be quite unaffordable for rank and file workers than a manual car.
It is particularly so given the fact that autonomous cars cause more pollution. Because those cars do not need drivers, one single person absolutely can drive many cars at once for specific purpose. If a number of people do the same thing, not only will traffic congestion be increased, but carbon emission can also become serious when a majority of cars are gasoline-powered. According to americanconversation.com, unless the electricity demand of robotic vehicles increases to 25 percent in 2050, transportation is still responsible for air pollution.
Last but not least, self-driving cars can be a dangerous tool for deleterious purpose. If the national controlling system for the cars is not completely developed, hackers and terrorists may take advantage of the so-called technical mistake to form fatal crashes. Then, they might blame a software companies and turn a criminal case into a pitiful accident. Some can even go anonymous to avoid penalty. When there is no driver, it is more difficult to identify, control or charge the owner of the car.
There has been some assertion that self-driving cars without drivers can reduce traffic accidents, or at least, human casualties. In fact, cars performed by AI may worsen the those accidents due to its inhumanity. For example, BBC News has already reported a case in which a robotic car struck and killed a woman in Arizona because it could not recognize her as a human. Robots always work based on a programme, while humans, from clothes to biological characteristics, are too distinctive for them to analyse. As a result, injuries caused by robots seem more cruel and calculated.
By way of conclusion, self-driving cars should not be legal for its cost burden, more pollution, and potential danger. No one should be hurted by a robotic car just to receive a small insurance fee as an apology. If a person want to depend on autonomous vehicles, he should focus on a perfect artificial intelligence, which we can expected in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontrol or charge the owner of the car. There has been some assertion that self-...
^^^
Line 11, column 332, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'expect'
Suggestion: expect
...t artificial intelligence, which we can expected in the near future.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, while, at least, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2590.0 1615.20841683 160% => OK
No of words: 503.0 315.596192385 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14910536779 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19510873804 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 176.041082164 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598409542744 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 506.74238477 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 2.10420841683 523% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2600764136 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.12 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407204131734 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107395375743 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118906267897 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217134569493 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109797407868 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.