Up to now, individuals over the world have improved their lives better than ever before, but there are still some left-behinds in economics who lack food, accommodation and knowledge. It may be argued that the wealth must share their wealth to help the low qualified countries in order to overcome the hardship, many discuss that the developing areas authorities are responsible for leading their civilians.
Although sharing a part of great properties to charity is acceptable, no one will approve for. The first reason is that the wealthy nations have vast influence on the others, individually like the US which leads the world's economy and accounts for almost all the markets in the world. Moreover, even if it was compulsory, there would be numerous conflicts around the world. The rich have made money by their own efforts and hard work, some may risk their own life to trade the condition they have now so that it is incredibly unfair.
In addition, governments of poor countries definitely reelect politicians who haven't fulfill their citizens' will. For a long time, it is the authorities' responsibility to draw the lines of happiness and wealthiness for their people. With the ones which underwork their job should be replaced by another better ones.\
In conclusion, it is not the weathy countries to take care of the homeless, the unemployed or the starved but it is those nations' government.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed. 73
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ndividually like the US which leads the worlds economy and accounts for almost all the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ries definitely reelect politicians who havent fulfill their citizens will. For a long...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authorities'' or 'authority's'?
Suggestion: authorities'; authority's
...tizens will. For a long time, it is the authorities responsibility to draw the lines of hap...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...employed or the starved but it is those nations government.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0643776824 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7863565311 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648068669528 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8286883124 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.111111111 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236396875346 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865207063649 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464449456371 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133359975838 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383523431853 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.