Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth and resources among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves?
It is remarkable the huge difference between countries that can provide a comfortable life to their people and countries that cannot even afford basic rights to their citizens. Because of that, some school of thought believes that strong economies should help poorer nations, supporting at least food and education, while some other people think the government should be responsible for looking after their internal problems.
Both points of view are interesting. Unfortunately, some countries do not have enough facilities and resources, especially when it comes to basic needs, such as food and education. Thinking about making the world a better place and also thinking as human beings, wealthy nations should help poor countries. If we want a country to develop and to be able to support their citizens, a good choice is providing at least education.
On the other hand, the idea of always helping poorer nations also brings the thought that those governments would not make any effort to improve their own situation. They would get used to external resources and money and this may create a vicious circle and probably they will always ask for more and more aids.
Therefore, a fair decision would not be to obligate rich nations to support problems of other governments, but to encourage them to motivate countries with certain issues to get back on their feet.
In conclusion, it is important that first world countries provide a little assistance for needy nations, in order to stimulate them to increase and get a better life standard. However, wealthy governments should always be ready to offer help to other nations in extreme cases, like hurricanes, floods, earthquakes or terrorist attack.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Jazz 12344 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Bholo | 73 | view |
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'at least', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222950819672 0.247107183377 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.147540983607 0.155533422707 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.131147540984 0.0946595960268 139% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0524590163934 0.0501214627716 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0459016393443 0.0437548338989 105% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0918032786885 0.122226691241 75% => OK
Participles: 0.0295081967213 0.0403226058552 73% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68853275219 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.055737704918 0.0326793684256 171% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.072131147541 0.0861772015684 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0360655737705 0.021408717616 168% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00983606557377 0.011925033212 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1717.0 1933.35771543 89% => OK
No of words: 276.0 316.048096192 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22101449275 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20517956788 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.394927536232 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286231884058 0.28420135186 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.195652173913 0.203846283523 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.144927536232 0.137316102897 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68853275219 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.037074148 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.56093040696 107% => OK
Word variations: 64.9020087872 60.7387585426 107% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0891783567 68% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0909090909 20.7743622355 121% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3372100016 49.517814964 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.090909091 127.492653851 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7743622355 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.27272727273 0.814263465372 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 53.7140974967 49.1944974215 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.4 1.69124875643 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487956497147 0.332605444948 147% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0838465774297 0.102741220458 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0548291664119 0.0668466124924 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.614639775302 0.534860350844 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.191808569827 0.148594505496 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192345137546 0.134430193775 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060150544361 0.0742795772207 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.259205497259 0.324371583561 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0463736578018 0.0638462369009 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289237582255 0.228012699653 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052511046092 0.058150111329 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.