Smart devices have put all of the world’s information at our fingertips. What are the drawbacks of this development?
The advancement of technology undoubtedly leads humanity to the bright future. Especially it applies to the smart devices like mobile phones, laptops, notebooks etc. Despite this, it is often argued that this way of gaining information can minimize human relationship and even cause health problems to its users. The main points to the argument are the dependence on technologies, lack of interaction between people and potential consequences to health.
Firstly, the development of modern technologies makes the lively human contact unnessesary. For instance, the statistics from Japan, that is considered as a fatherland of high-tech, represents that so-called “kodokushi” (the phenomena of lonely death) has been rising since 2015, exceeding 45 thousand each year. People lose their friends and acquaintances due to work and attachment to the gadgets and, therefore it results in loneliness and abandondment at the end of their life. Consequently, the services and applications which were made to provide an opportunity of remote communication, however, lead their users to contact on a distant way, in fact, preventing them from getting along with each other in normal way.
In addition, according to the studies, laziness and procrastination rises dramatically between the users of smart devices and mobile phones is the perfect example of it. This particular piece of technology gives its user an access to a wide variety of services. You do not need to turn your TV on to watch favorite programme or to have a walk to the bookshop to buy a book you like – your smartphone, which is connected to the World Web within the “wireless fidelity”, contains all the books, all the news and all the videos that were made. Thus, the US healthcare organizations tie the increase of number of american children and teenagers suffering from obesity during the last 5 years not only with the popularity of junk food, but also with the usage of gadgets and insufficient amount of fresh-air activities.
In summary, smart devices help people to gather information about all spheres and from all corners of the world, but some disadvantages, like loss of human connections and certain health problems overrides its benefits. It is predicted that the development of mobile technology and related devices will cause even more harm to the humanity in future.
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- The widespread of the Internet has brought many problems. What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of the web? What solutions can you suggest? 78
- Smart devices have put all of the world s information at our fingertips What are the drawbacks of this development 95
- International sporting events such as the Olympic Games and the Football World Cup provide an outlet for patriotic feelings and help reduce international tensions To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...ular piece of technology gives its user an access to a wide variety of services. You do n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 341, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ll cause even more harm to the humanity in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in fact, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29442970822 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15721633283 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602122015915 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.0177809092 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.571428571 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9285714286 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209991733978 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592795605008 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539648111939 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122328761541 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490712449166 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.