Cutting-edge equipments mean getting every information in the worlds with our touching. This development brought many advantages for people to looking for information and connect people together through only a phone or a tablet. In spite of enhancement of smart devices, I can't refuse that there are several of disadvantages of this development that impact on people's lives. This essay will analyze the negative effects to creation and relationships of humans.
On the one hand, people could not have a creation and operation of their brain, they become more passive in thinking and understanding because of increase of useful information on the internet. A good example of this is that my sister, who was assigned, did not think anything, she just accessed internet and there are thousands results for her task and she completed it quickly, without thinking. Development of technology makes people become more lazy, passive and do not really reflect upon what the solutions are, it even dilute humans' concentration and memories. Thus, this is one of the most drawback of spread of modern technological devices.
On the other hand, state-of-the-art equipments also make a distance between every person and people around them. Focusing on accessing the internet or flicker Facebook, Instagram means do not care about anyone. Sometimes, going to the coffee shop and we could suprise, and realize that everyone is holding their phone, doing something but don't talk with their friends, who is opposite and holding ones. We can see that everywhere, even in ourselves. Everything in the internet too fascinating and can not be left, it's not too strange when people very like devices and ready to immerse in fiction life. Though this view, we can see that the increasing change of modern equipments is a bad effect for people.
To summarize, the drawbacks of developing smart devices are lack of truly thinking and being unfamiliar with people around a person. It is predicted that people will develop properly and have solutions for these drawbacks in the essay, world could witnessed a better modern life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...pite of enhancement of smart devices, I cant refuse that there are several of disadv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n what the solutions are, it even dilute humans concentration and memories. Thus,...
^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...what the solutions are, it even dilute humans concentration and memories. Thus, this ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...olding their phone, doing something but dont talk with their friends, who is opposit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...et too fascinating and can not be left, its not too strange when people very like d...
^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'witness'
Suggestion: witness
...ese drawbacks in the essay, world could witnessed a better modern life.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, really, so, thus, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18768328446 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80033009221 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577712609971 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0627659566 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197065244819 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632603756593 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538058985021 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133512031752 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073256413633 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.