Social media is gradually replacing in person face to face contact with many people worldwide. Do the benefits of social media outweigh the disadvantages?
In this century, direct interaction among people is gradually replaced by social media offering global communication as its remarkable benefit. I will deliberate how this view, despite some considerable disadvantages, contributes to greater advantages which will be explained in the forthcoming paragraph.
On the one side, perhaps, the demerits of relying much on social media is that this phenomenon decreases human sense compared to face-to-face communication such as facial expression or body gesture. Modern society living in metropolitan cities, then, will be more into egocentric and helpless to those who truly build interactions and need for help. Moreover, sadly, what people share in social media seems different with their real life. Followed by public attention they seek for, through manipulating story line, such individual may be stricken with star syndrome. They present images as perfect as possible, even extra effort they take which may drive them into horrible consequences.
On the other side, we should highlight some merits of this issue that social media substantially broadens social network around the world. It links users at anytime and anywhere, thus not only perceiving dynamic insight, modern generation can also be simplified through ongoing process (Trello - streamline individuals and collaborative projects) resulting in novel invention. Furthermore, free advertising products on media platforms as one of digital marketing strategies globally may increase opportunity to scale up the business. Such platforms address products (Nike and Coach) to get seen 24/7/365, establishing a new fan who becomes hyper-target audiences, specifically to make consumer purchasing decision.
In brief, I would contradict that the benefits of interaction through social media may include limitless international colleagues and scale up the business profit. Thus, this outweighs a significant drawback.
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 89
- More and more people want to own items such as cars clothing and other things that are made by famous brands Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- More and more people want to own items such as cars clothing and other things that are made by famous brands Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think we can improve our intelligence through learning Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- There is more and more outrage and anger common in society today Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, in brief, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87857142857 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08386757693 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.714285714286 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.67339676 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.615384615 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254276670974 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861863132318 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094006060803 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147886908287 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309546107334 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, in brief, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87857142857 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08386757693 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.714285714286 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.67339676 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.615384615 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254276670974 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861863132318 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094006060803 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147886908287 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309546107334 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.