The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary society, diverse types of advertising are introduced regardless their purposes. Some people claim that restriction of all categories advertisement is the best way to avoid their pointless and detrimental effect to the society. However, from my standpoint, there are numerous benefits obtained from the announcement of these advertisements.
The most obvious advantage of the advertising is that they assist to provide consumer with any new production. By their assistance, individuals are aware of the future of products. If there is some prohibition on all forms of advertisement, it stands in the way of recognition of some products. As a result of this, manufacturers may lose their power or it influences consumers’ attitude.
Another positive point belongs to advertisements, they can generate abundance of choices when individuals decide to purchase something. It enables to compare the products in terms of their quality, cost, feature and others. The ban on multiple kinds of advertisement might limit the choices of purchasers. Thus, there should be vast numbers of advertisements in order to fulfill requirement of individuals and select the goods wisely.
Notwithstanding, some drawbacks are carried out by advertising. During the performance of them on mass-media, manufacturers untold negative sides of their productions to the community. As well as, advertisement companies exaggerate the quality of productions.
Taking everything into consideration, although some people support the view that it is useful to restrict the advertisements, I believe, they service to the community in order to introduce the modern commodities and their properties.
- The chart shows the proportion of graduates from Bluesky University in 2006 entering different employer sectors. 56
- The given bar chart indicates a comparison of Australian genders with the exact percents who do exercises frequently according to their various age groups As can be seen from the chart males did more physical exercises than females at the age of 15 to 24
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- A university should accept male and female students equally in every subject.Clover:To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'categories'' or 'category's'?
Suggestion: categories'; category's
...me people claim that restriction of all categories advertisement is the best way to avoid ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73705179283 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54154808191 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617529880478 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2379588614 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119540504122 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368414766123 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03304534783 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.058936005342 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350550799909 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.