The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, although advertisements have brought a huge number of benefits, in fact, there are many forms of advertising which are unethical and unacceptable. Therefore, several people argue that it is necessary to ban all of them. In my opinion, the authorities just need to control them not prohibit totally.

Advertisements should be inhibited completely due to negative effects they have. It is useful that advertising of unhealthy foods aim at children should be banned. It is obvious that kids are prone to be attracted by the interesting contents of these programs. Therefore, if the government do not forbid these kinds of advertisement, the health of the young generation would be deteriorated. Another reason is that all products are displayed and sold in various groceries and supermarkets which take over almost corners of the world. So it is unnecessary to advertise all items on the media.

However, I think that advertising is necessary for free-market economies and we should not ban them totally. The first reason for this is that advertising plays a vital role in increasing the demand for products in society. For example, advertising products on TV can arouse the desire of the viewer and then buying it although they do not tend to buy before. Moreover, we can prevent consumers from the adverse impacts of the advertisements of damaging products. For instance, the government impose a law which requires advertisers to display warnings on cigarette packets. Therefore, governments should only censor false information or products that are harmful.

In conclusion, many individuals oppose that the authorities should forbid advertisements while I argue that governments should only control promotions of harmful products.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-02 nguyen thi thu hien 67 view
2019-09-19 tn.ngo296 67 view
2019-05-27 Abhayraj 67 view
2019-05-27 Abhayraj 67 view
2019-05-20 Zukhra 73 view
Essays by user nguyen thi thu hien :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38909090909 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14045845998 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567272727273 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7440324116 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.625 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184366253616 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613744831897 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378058875518 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10131766715 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509784147142 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.