The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree

In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that society would benefit from a ban on all platforms of advertising, some people concur that it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging. However, I quibble from them and propound that they are telling the truth.

Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of this modern world that it is good for society to put ban on all advertising. The top notch concrete reason is that it is seen that when you wake up in the morning the first thing you do is brushing. However, even the toothpaste contains advertisement label on that and not only that it can be seen every thing you use is a part of advertisement. Another retinoate which hauls me to patron is we are being crushed in this contemporary world by advertisement. There is not a such thing which is not being advertise. In research, it is manifest that a normal human eye sees about 1 lakh ads per day while just going to work.

What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So the public in general tend to distinguish that, without advertisement how will all the business will grow? As the advertisement is the main key feature to grow sales in this world. Which has multifarious reasons. To commence, with some people deem that without advertisement all the new ideas fail. As the new ideas will not communicate with the people as advertisement is the main thing for them to sale their product.

In recapitulation, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting ban on all platforms of advertising. However, it's contrary can be overlooked or controlled. Consequently, I firmly agree to the given statement.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
...iety to put ban on all advertising. The top notch concrete reason is that it is seen that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h ads per day while just going to work. What is half full for some, may appear h...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nt how will all the business will grow? As the advertisement is the main key featu...
^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ey feature to grow sales in this world. Which has multifarious reasons. To commence, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n thing for them to sale their product. In recapitulation, I reiterate that ther...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, may, so, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81034482759 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96038248324 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562068965517 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3166521386 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0588235294 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88235294118 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311205370776 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078721573223 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094881301012 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187334067191 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109009975051 0.056905535591 192% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.