Now a days, pollution is increasing day by day which is effecting the environment. To solve this problem most of the people appreciated to increase the fuel price. I have strongly antipode thoughts regarding this verdict and going to explain in the upcoming paragraph.
To begin with, increasing the price of fuel is not effective way to control the situation. It will also affect directly or indirectly on other measures. For an instance, there are some places which are not able to produce grains or other needed materials and these cities import the required materials from natives. It will affect the cost of these products. Secondly, a person who can buy a car it obvious that he has ability to buy fuel as well.
To the contrary, there are other innumerable adequate methods. Firstly, government should make rigour laws so that a single family can have solely one car. Secondly, government should declare “Odd and Even” system. So that only odd or even numbered vehicles can run on the road on one day. Moreover, motor companies should optimise the advance technology so that less amount of gasses can emit from the vehicles. Furthermore, we should support the eco-friendly battery or solar operated vehicles and also people should choose to commute on foot rather than using their personal car.
In-a-nutshell, hiking the fuel price is an absurd way to overcome this situation. There are other efficient systems which are economical and eco-friendly. Government and people should immerse to solve this epidemic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
Now a days, pollution is increasing day by day whi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
Now a days, pollution is increasing day by day whi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t rather than using their personal car. In-a-nutshell, hiking the fuel price is ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should immerse to solve this epidemic.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7271200927 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2238918494 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8823529412 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7058823529 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131523648189 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473521764636 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810877162049 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962233541433 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662938702628 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.