To solve ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption?
2017 year is expected to the warmest year ever the planet has experienced, according to NASA. This extreme weather condition can be the result of increased number of cars and industries. Thus, many environment protection organizations believe that a high price for fuel can be a solution to the issue; however, solutions can be found in alternative sources of energy and a better infrastructure planning due to the fact that increasing the price of fuel can trigger economic and social crises.
Statistics show that every year more cars are sold than previous ones all over the world due to the affordable price of petrol, which implies the increased amount of fume in the air contaminating the environment and intensifying the layer of the green house gas in the atmosphere. At first glance to the issue, expensive gas can seem to be the best option; nevertheless, more profound research suggests electric cars and more environment-friendly sources of energy such as solar and biofuel solve the current issues. Tesla. for instance, one of the most commercially successful electric cars, is as effective as any other conventional cars. Moreover, the car consumes only electricity to run in the streets which makes it as polluting as smart phones or kitchen contrivances. In addition, solar energy and biofuel can substitute petrol in such areas building and manufacturing.
A good infrastructure planning also can be a solution since traffic jam is peculiar to many metropolises. Research indicates that a high concentration of cars in relatively small areas such as main streets and highways intensifies the hazardous effect of carbon dioxide emitted to the air. Thus, authorities should manage car flows wisely to avoid congestions.
Humanity has not attained advanced technologies which would allow to alter the price of fuel drastically since chemical industry still is exploiting the resource. Thus, trying to solve the problem by increasing the price for fuel, we might put other valuable industries into jeopardy resulting in economic and social issues.
Increased environmental hazards have reached its peak nowadays. Thus, it is critical that one of the possible solutions is taken; otherwise, we can lose our nature eternally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-04 | Parmveer Singh | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.) 61
- The graphs below show the number of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia. 78
- Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes? 61
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...iofuel solve the current issues. Tesla. for instance, one of the most commercially ...
^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'altering'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: altering
...advanced technologies which would allow to alter the price of fuel drastically since che...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33521126761 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09707517314 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9877767402 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.266666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167799826297 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531255940102 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060256737255 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952811128012 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468255636123 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.