Children using mobile phones has been one of phenomenon in todays world. Numerous youngsters use smartphones more than an hour in a day. This essay will address the root of this problem and provides opinions related to the downsides of this behavior.
Many factors contributing to the overused of smartphones among the children. First of all, many parents have a lack of awareness related to the downsides of exessives use of smartphones on their children. Whenever children have a trantrum, the parents are providing their children mobile devices to console them, making the children considering the devices as their playthings. Secondly, Parents use smartphones to play online games when they are with their children, allowing the children to grow interest on this devices. As a result, many children are asking smartphones to their parents.
Although the usage of mobile phone can have some beneficial for children, such as learning new languages or gain information, I personally consider that this device is dangerous. Children using smartphone more than one hour in a day have a higher possibility to suffer from bad eyesight, making them have to wear glasses at early age. Furthermore, studies have also reported that children who are given access to mobile phones are likely to experience tantrum in comparison to the children who have not access to the devices, and this may result in development of negative traits on the children.
To sum up, the principal factor contributing to overused of smartphones by children is less awareness of parents about the disadvatanges of this devices to their children. I think that children using smartphone excesively have more risk to suffer eye problems and developmental problems.
- Fewer and fewer people today right by hand using a pen pencil or brush What are the reasons Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graphs below show the number of visits to and from the UK between 1979 and 1999 and some destinations of UK citizens traveling abroad
- The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from school 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...lowing the children to grow interest on this devices. As a result, many children are...
^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s of parents about the disadvatanges of this devices to their children. I think that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, i think, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28158844765 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89919344456 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523465703971 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7532388062 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.538461538 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298306957291 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128427307329 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398190821351 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198276077994 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254012092644 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.