Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?
The rise in demand for estates can be seen as the massive growth of population in the metropolitan areas. Therefore, to solve this problem, some people tend to build taller buildings, while developing houses in the wider areas are more reliable for others. Which one is the better solution?
Development of the gigantic and taller building as a resident is more preferred by people due to the number of capacity that is provided with a small footprint. That is to say that, the skyscraper in metropolitan cities can provide more houses for people in just one building, requiring a small location to develop it and avoiding the high price of land. For instance, the Kalla resident can accommodate about 150 families in their apartment, locating in the west of Makassar city with a land area about 3480 metres square. Therefore, people can get a house at an affordable price locating in the city centre.
That said, having a house in a wider area is more promising as this is offered a spacious room for the house owner. That is because some people, in particular, the older one needs more space to do their activities without any distraction from the neighbour living too close to them. A survey by House Market Company in 2019 revealed that 57% of people aged 40 and over chose to live in their own lives with a backyard and private car park, while 28% of them preferred to stay in the apartment having maximum 3 floors. Hence, owning a private space can make them more relax and free to do their activities without any worries to disturb by others.
Due to the huge increase in required for residents, create a skyscraper can be seen as a solution, offering the big capacities of houses, while some people are more likely to choose the house with a wider land giving more space for private activities. There possible, people have a suitable budget with their house preferences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-17 | buiminhduc | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-17 | buiminhduc | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | lilin_ | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | rafsanfardin | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | Awadhesh Mourya | 78 | view |
- The three pictures show a train station before during and after construction changes 76
- Percentage of Children with Different Educational Problems in Two Primary School 80
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 67
- The graph compares the numbers of smokers among the two sexes in a place called Someland from 1960 to 2000 67
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, so, therefore, while, for instance, in particular, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75609756098 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57461524591 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518292682927 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7924417855 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281149002883 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107509270941 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819748269661 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180542154781 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412112799302 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.