Some cities do not restrict how stylish and unique can houses and offices be that people construct. Is this trend positive or negative?
Architectures in the modern world demands innovative ideas to fully amaze individuals. For that reason, there is a plethora of designs of new buildings coming from many architects in this growing industry without any limitation from the cities’ authority. Despite some benefits this tendency offers, there is a massive problem that requires serious consideration.
To begin with, freedom in the designs of modern buildings has several merits. Since this trend helps to build up plenty of different houses and office complexes, it create a great diversity in the general look of a whole city, which somehow cultivates the busy lifestyle of these modern cities. For example, when people settle in New York, they usually get overwhelmed by the different types of the city’s architectures and start to follow the fast pace of living. Furthermore, with this growing tendency, architects are hugely encouraged to use their creativity to come up with more interesting ideas. This adds more choices in the pool of stylish and unique designs which differs the style of buildings.
Unfortunately, a major issue will occur when governments do not restrict the innovation of designs in residential areas, there has always been a standardization of houses to maintain the balance of the areas’ overall look. If each and every personal building is unique, there can be a different in the size of houses which makes the neighborhood unappealing and unattractive to the residents. As a result, the sales of these houses can be slowed down drastically and the distribution of population could be unbalanced consequently. To summarize, the demerit of this tendency is far more unfavorable for the authority than the advantages.
In conclusion, while it is positive to some extent, the problem that constructing of stylish houses and offices without limitation is more severe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | erman.duran95 | 73 | view |
- You cannot go to a company where you got an offer. Write a letter to the HR supervisor to:» Explain the reason why you decline the offer» Express your gratitude» Explain why you like your current job very much. 73
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 78
- In recent years the pressure of students in university is increasing and they are pushed to work hard from a young age Do you think it is a positive or negative development 75
- Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe this is a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate. But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in wider variety of methods, our communication and social abilities have taken a step back.Why does technological advancement hurt nontechnica 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...fferent houses and office complexes, it create a great diversity in the general look o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35810810811 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07899852568 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5882004873 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279294077684 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807760328874 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627199795916 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160591130143 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601658403024 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.