In the contemporary society, some corporations allocate money in sports sponsorship as a means of advertising themselves. Some individuals advocate is a wise idea while the others are opposed to this. From my point of view, this would create certain positive effects but there will also be some negative effects.
On the one hand, there are many positive aspects that sport sponsorship has for society. To begin with, one major advantage is that there will be more ample financial resources, which can enhance advanced training equipment. As a result, this can motivate sportsmen to practice harder and then deliver their best performance in the competition. Additionally, another point worth pointing out of allocating money in sports sponsorship is that it could boost brand name awareness among the public. Hence, the companies will not only promote sales but also create reputation and profit.
On the other hand, despite the above mentioned benefits, corporating sponsorship in sports also generates many downsides that companies should take into account. Initially, it is undoubted that the sponsors of sports today are often tobacco and alcohol companies. However, the number of sports viewers is not limited by age, it can range from young to old. Therefore, young people will be negatively affected by some inappropriate advertised content. On top of that, another important factor to consider is that focusing excessively on advertising can shift talent to profit, which might spoil the fundamental spirit of sport and can lead to a loss of authentic sportsmanship. Consequently, this will trigger unhealthy and deteriorative competition.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that corporating sponsorship in sports has its own demerits and merits. I honestly hope that companies can choose compatible way, depending on their situation.
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 78
- As computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 67
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, honestly, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, as for, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55555555556 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0230276194 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614583333333 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1059378575 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172866719498 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581316790851 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493163374743 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110896548026 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651821353149 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.