some company think the best way to motivate and encourage worker to work hard is to pay them how much they produce and sell. do you agree or disagree? include any relevant examples based on your knowledge and experience.
Every company loves high productivity from the employees. Thus, some organizations have tried to increase the work rate of their workers by paying them according to how much they produce and sell. In my opinion, this is an efficient policy for any employer.
First of all, raising salaries will encourage higher productivity than the normal amount. Almost everyone pursues a greater salary, so many will try to be a great asset to their employers. Because of this, frequent raises in wages will be a huge morale boost for employees. Not only that, this method will also foster loyalty. paying company members more and more makes them confident in their chances of future promotion; as a result, many will seek a deep attachment to the company.
On the other hand, it is widely argued that this policy will bring about jealousy and competitiveness in the company. For example, there may be discontent among senior members of an organization if the newly employed are paid more than them. However, this might actually be a good way to reduce the redundant workforce. A lower salary than the majority of co-workers most likely means your contribution is not up to standard. it is a sign for those individuals to either improve their performance or look to work elsewhere.
Overall, I believe determining salary according to productivity and sales is an effective policy. this method will help companies to foster work rate as well as get rid of redundant workers. organizations should implement this strategy carefully and make adjustments where needed.
- some company think the best way to motivate and encourage worker to work hard is to pay them how much they produce and sell do you agree or disagree include any relevant examples based on your knowledge and experience 61
- Some people think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is pay them based on how much they produce and sell do you agree or disagree and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s an efficient policy for any employer. First of all, raising salaries will enco...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Paying
..., this method will also foster loyalty. paying company members more and more makes the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...our contribution is not up to standard. it is a sign for those individuals to eith...
^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ivity and sales is an effective policy. this method will help companies to foster wo...
^^^^
Line 6, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Organizations
...s well as get rid of redundant workers. organizations should implement this strategy carefull...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, for example, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0859375 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80724335147 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64453125 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5147687615 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.375 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129430254135 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402804365707 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669140298293 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928625306492 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847627036853 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.