Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that in some countries, they build exclusive training facilities for elite athletes, rather than investing in sports facilities that are accessible to the general public. While I believe that this approach may lead to greater international success in sports, it also poses some negative aspects.
On the one hand, customized infrastructures for top athletes can have many positive effects. This development can give a country's athletes a competitive edge and enhance their chances of winning medals and championships. For example, a country with a world-class high-altitude training center may have an advantage in endurance sports such as distance running and cycling. Additionally, investing in top athletes can raise the profile of a country and bring international recognition, which can have positive effects on tourism and the economy. Furthermore, supporting top athletes can inspire and motivate younger generations to pursue sports, leading to a healthier and more active society.
On the one hand, customized infrastructures for top athletes can have many positive effects. Firstly, this development can give a country's athletes a competitive edge and enhance their chances of winning medals and championships. For example, a country with a world-class high-altitude training center may have an advantage in endurance sports such as distance running and cycling. Secondly, investing in top athletes can raise the profile of a country and bring international recognition, which can have positive effects on tourism and the economy. Finally, supporting top athletes can inspire and motivate younger generations to pursue sports, leading to a healthier and more active society.
In conclusion, while the emphasis on the development of facilities for top athletes can lead to be global achievements in sports and bring recognition to a country, it is a negative development if it neglects the needs of the wider population and promotes elitism in sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- Companies use different ways to increase sales What different ways do companies use to increase sales What is the most effective 78
- While people in developing countries are happier than in the past people in developed countries are less happy Why What can be learnt from this 67
- In some countries more and more adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s facilities that are accessible to the general public. While I believe that this approach may...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56146179402 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22198165277 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.395348837209 0.561755894193 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0744394521 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.769230769 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366812495151 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142726215021 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570469402969 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251077165905 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00635663642891 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.