Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree?
It is thought by some people that due to the use of computers, people will not need to visit public museum and art galleries to see objects and pieces of art relating to history. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this view.
The first reason is that visiting a museum or gallery in person provides a unique and immersive experience that cannot be replicated by viewing images on a screen. Seeing an artwork or artifact with viewers’ own eyes allows them to appreciate its scale, texture, and materiality, as well as its historical and cultural context. In doing this, the audiences may learn some meaningful lessons. For example, a trip to Con Dao prison helps visitors better understand the hardships and crimes of war caused to the Vietnamese people, from which they will highly appreciate the peace they have today.
Furthermore, museums and galleries serve an important role in preserving and protecting cultural heritage. Without public institutions to collect, preserve, and display historical objects and works of art, there is a risk that these objects could be lost or destroyed over time. Therefore, by collecting and housing these artifacts in a controlled environment, institutions can protect them from the risk. They can also ensure that the objects are properly cared for and maintained, which can help to extend their lifespan and prevent them from deteriorating over time.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that going to public museums and art galleries provides people with unique experiences and preserves cultural assets for future generations.
- PEOPLE THINK THAT SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES HAVE A HUGE NEGATIVE IMPACT ON BOTH INDIVIDUALS AND SOCIETY DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 56
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think it is happening How to solve this issue 78
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Companies use different ways to increase sales What different ways do companies use to increase sales What is the most effective 78
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cultural assets for future generations.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2766798419 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83652402594 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616600790514 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0147299449 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.363636364 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316872244403 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108049033368 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115804420291 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202560733718 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107590489861 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.