In recent era, it is believed that in some nations, advertising tends to exert an influenceon kids with a view to purchase noshes, playthings and others. Children usually bring pressure to bear on their parents to buy them things. Nevertheless, sponsors aver that ad informs customers precious information. Personally, I totally disagree with the aforementioned issue.
On the one hand, advertisements have negative impacts on children. In recent lifestyle, thanks to the development of technologies, adverts can be accessible not only in printed edition encompassing newspapers or magazines but also in a multiplicity of social networks with electronic versions. Unfortunatly, it aims to manipulate kids due to their easy susceptibility. My six-year-old brother, as a prime example, traditionally comples my parent to process whatever he sees in the televison.
From another angle, however, information about products was gave out to assist buyers to make a wise decission. It is in evidence that advertising is a key part of state-of-the-art bussiness and a form of art. For instance, a commercial usually attracts watchers by its creativeness, colour, picture and sound. Hence, by enjoying the clip, buyers not only can entertain themselves but also receive necessary statistics regarding merchandises. And, these data are believable because if the reputable companies provide wrong, false or untruthful information for the ordinary citizens, the authorities will enact strict laws and policies to punish them.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against promotion, but I strongly opine that advertisers often affect young people’s outlook on publicity.
- Successful companies use advertising to make more sales. What can make an advertisement very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society? 61
- In some countries, advertisers increase the amount of advertising which try to persuade children to buy snacks, toys, and other goods. Parents object to such pressure on children. but some advertisers claim that there is useful information in the advertis 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anks to the development of technologies, adverts can be accessible not only in pr...
^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
...however, information about products was gave out to assist buyers to make a wise dec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70238095238 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38821737892 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.72619047619 0.561755894193 129% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.856139637 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.642857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167318840698 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503012069126 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610841580033 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925062752616 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484286477056 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.