In recent era, it is strongly believed that various reputable companies use adverts to keep customers informed about their products as much as possible. Persionally, while advertising has its positive infuences on daily life, I opine that contents of advertisiments exert a negative impact on purchasers, especially children, to buy more things than their real needs.
On the one hand, it is in evidence that adverts assist ordinary citizens many things in their life. Firstly, on account for the increasingly high frequency of television and online advertisiments, it is of significance that buyers are able to know clearly about a range of updated products to make wise decisions. In recent years, it is no denying that the big and successful companies comply better with the multiple strict consumer protection laws stipulated by governments and relevant authorities to maintain product transparency.
From another angle, commercial also causes bad susceptibilities in normal life. Advertisers are intent on attracting viewers, specially young consumers, with a view to purchase an array of things they do not need owing to their easy affections. It is a truism that people can lead a healthy lifestyle without junk food, toys, comics and so on. My six-year-old brother, as a prime example, always bring pressure to bear on my parents to buy him things whenever he sees a manipulative promotion about nosh or playthings.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against publicity, but I believe that advertisements manipulate buyers in order to own unnecessary goods.
- In some countries, advertisers increase the amount of advertising which try to persuade children to buy snacks, toys, and other goods. Parents object to such pressure on children. but some advertisers claim that there is useful information in the advertis 61
- Successful companies use advertising to make more sales. What can make an advertisement very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout nosh or playthings. In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.372 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16020505664 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.704 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6863430543 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.3 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205776322464 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631887659574 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349366466807 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103451399646 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181908944941 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.