In some countries, the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them?
It is said that there is an increase in the average weight of people while their physical status is going down. In this essay, I am going to discuss the causes as well as suggest some solutions to tackle this problem.
To begin with, a rise in fast food consumption is taken into consideration. In the contemporary world, people are now given more assignments to handle, which gives rise to a lack of time for cooking. Therefore, junk food which contains a huge amount of fat leading to obesity comes under a perfect option for human beings. Furthermore, people are having less time working out. In fact, as can be seen, members of society have more things such as work or family to take into account, which take them approximately a day. Consequently, they end up having no time for doing exercises.
As this is such a desperate issue, some measures should be suggested. Firstly, the government ought to increase fast food prices to keep people’s health at bay. For example, most junk food in Singapore have been taxed 3 times higher to avoid people consume this kind of food. Besides, a reduction in working hours seems to benefit most workers. Employers can both work out and cook for themselves provided that they do not have to work much in a day.
In conclusion, people consume more junk food, yet having less time to work out are the two remarkable causes to the problem. In order to tackle such issues, the government had better increase fast food prices as well as reduce office hours.
- Happiness is often considered difficult to define Why is this What factors determine happiness 56
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 61
- The pie charts display the proportion of key sources of energy used in the USA between 1980s and 1990s
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they do not have to work much in a day. In conclusion, people consume more junk ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68939393939 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53260419767 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2292457637 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5333333333 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142715233699 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516470243559 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438740155474 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984055088464 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425286201012 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they do not have to work much in a day. In conclusion, people consume more junk ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68939393939 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53260419767 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2292457637 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5333333333 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142715233699 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516470243559 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438740155474 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984055088464 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425286201012 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.