In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the dvantages outweigh disadvantages

There is no doubt of saying that generation gap among parents and their children has been extremely wider. Unfortunately, parents and children both have to sufffer more regarding this scenario. Similarly, it has more disadvantages than advantages.

To embark upon, there are numerous reasons which support that it has more drawbacks for the society. First and foremost, earlier people had sensational relationships due to less generation gap among parents and their children. Nowadays, the trend has been completely changed because changed perspectives of youngsters do not allow them to get close with their parents. As a result, they always perceive them as less awared in the society. Secondly, it is usual seen that people get close to their aim or goal by having a fruitful consulation from any expert or legandry. Similarly, youngsters’ pathway of success gets shorter and approachable when they come up with the suggestions of their parents as an experienced people. Wider generation gap not only takes both away from each other, but also affects on the longer realtionship.

On ther other hand, some have perception that senior class always abstain them to try something new because of it’s uncertainty and impose restrictions on them. Which may not be completely fulfilling them under these restrictions. Today, changed the generation gap bring many opportunities to try frequently.

In conclusion, considering the differences in generation gap bring not always rosy results it intersects the society equally in terms of relationship, value and respect. It is fairly not good much for children, when a new adaption of generation gap is accepted.

Votes
Average: 5.9 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so affects on the longer realtionship. On ther other hand, some have perception...
^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tainty and impose restrictions on them. Which may not be completely fulfilling them u...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41379310345 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06674765958 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613026819923 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.775596897 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.088909865003 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032950565036 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036322452124 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620204649389 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048042306663 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.