in some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries some people think that is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In a part of the world, a little person can make a lot of money. From my point of view, this is a positive effect on their government and country.
The biggest advantage of this is that it shows the increasing intellectual level of the people. One thing all of us have been known that companies always have a salary payment system following the ability that employees bring to them. It is means higher qualifications and skills will be paid a higher salary. That is why just a few numbers of people can be reached to the extremely salaries, the part of the reason is they must shoulder a huge responsibility for the survival of the company. In a country, if we have a lot of people with high salaries, that means the nation's intellectual population has also increased dramatically. The result of the high level of education is that the state budget is also increased, this is because the tax paid by employees is based on the salary they are paid.
On the other hand, the flow of money obeys a law of conservation, which greatly affects the salary a person is paid. If someone gets paid more, someone gets paid less. Because of that, the gap between rich and poor will increase significantly. And if the government wants to solve this problem, it must raise the inflation rate, which can lead to a huge consequence.
In conclusion, although paying high wages to a few people has both positive and negative sides. But, in my opinion, If the state does not have any policies to curb the problem of workers' wages, the struggle for qualifications of employees will increase rapidly, which will attract a lot of investment capital from abroad.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-02 | khoa.d.le08 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | khoa.d.le08 | 61 | view |
- An increasing number of people are buying what they need online what are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping online 92
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands now being done by machines does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 61
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on the Internet While the Internet is convenient it has many negative effects and its use for educational purposes should be restricted How far do you agree with this statement 61
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on the Internet While the Internet is convenient it has many negative effects and its use for educational purposes should be restricted How far do you agree with this statement 73
- Due to the development and rapid expansions of supermarkets in some countries many small local business are unable to compete some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64261168385 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73228077378 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518900343643 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0667053506 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150864279659 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487052490327 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477414301642 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842690889818 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303809249209 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64261168385 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73228077378 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518900343643 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0667053506 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150864279659 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487052490327 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477414301642 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842690889818 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303809249209 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.