In some countries, the government has tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative?
With the rapid development of current society, traffic congestion is an increasing issue among the public. In some nations, the government imposed a congestion tax as a measure to decrease traffic in the rush time. In my opinion, such an approach is a positive development in this modern society.
One the one hand, as an effective measure of modern urban traffic management, congestion pricing plays a significant role in theory and practice. To begin with, congestion pricing will lead people to avoid commuting by private cars in the rush time. Indeed, people could be encouraged to use public transport more or drive cars away from peak time. Secondly, as an additional tax, congestion pricing is increasing the government revenue in some ways which will be beneficial to the public. For example, governments could use these tax revenue to construct and run more efficient and effectiveness of traffic system. Finally, by far charging congestion tax is an effective solution to reduce traffic congestion.
On the other hand, this kind of extra expense will impose a burden on some people. Transport services, for example, such expense will increase the cost of the business running because whatever the tax will be charged or not, they have to drive the /cars all the time. Besides, it is true that this financial burden eventually will be distributed to all of us due to the increasing price. Furthermore, people who cannot avoid travelling out of the rush time will be suffered as well. Overall, it seems to impose congestion pricing eventually will impact people’ life as well as some particular business.
In conclusion, although there are some negative effects due to charging congestion tax, we cannot ignore the merits of this solution which by far certainly help the government to achieve the congestion reduction to some extent. I believe that congestion pricing is a positive development which is entirely justified despite there are some different views.
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries, the criminal trials are shown on the TV and the general public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 87
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 61
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84470451014 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503125 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1104769573 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281472541263 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105923681229 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699221549089 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196167275396 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605097502186 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.