In some countries, if people need to find work, they have to move away from their families and
their friends. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Relocating from home and close people for seeking careers is becoming a tendency all over the world. This essay attempts to shed light on both the merits and demerits of this trend before concluding that the former notion is more significant.
On the one hand, leaving families for searching occupations is disadvantageous to some extents. First and foremost, this trend will give rise to the lack of employee in certain nations. This is because if people who have high educational degrees and skills tend to move aboard for work, their home countries will face with the risk of serious labor shortage. As a consequence, this trend could have an adverse bearing on the economic recession of the states. Another reason is that international employees might have to face with numerous obstacles when trying to find opportunities aboard such as home sick, culture shock and language barrier. Additionally, companies tend to hire candidates who are local citizens because of the huge cost for working visa sponsorship for immigrants while it takes no cost for hiring indigenous employees. Therefore, this factor could reduce the opportunities of foreigners in finding a suitable career when living far from home.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reason as to why I am convinced that it is more beneficial to residing in foreign for career seeking. One rationale is that individuals could stand a greater chance to landing a better living standard. For instance, some rich nations in Europe or America offer citizens higher income and better social welfares than some new developing countries. This act as a precursor to a better future for individuals and society as a whole. Another justification is that working in diverse environments are significantly contribute to human career ladders. This argue could be explained by the fact that several multinational enterprises nowadays tend to recruit employees with enrich working experiences abroad working for them. Therefore, people could stand a greater chance in landing a higher wages and promotion opportunities in their career ladders.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that moving away from home to landing occupations could have some downsides, I would contend that the upside which it offers are significantly noteworthy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-07 | uyenmia | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | hinhin411 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Vivi_peach | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | thaoduong1902 | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in million of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparion where relevants 56
- Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies while others argue that robots might have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- People in many countries are spending less time with their families What are the reasons and effects of this 78
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
... home. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reason as to why I am con...
^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contributed'.
Suggestion: contributed
... diverse environments are significantly contribute to human career ladders. This argue cou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28065395095 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93174335955 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558583106267 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.217773036 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162916158602 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509428611378 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506756149217 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996420118968 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443080761093 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.