In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, people have a tendency to consume junk food excessively and thus are prone to diseases such as diabetes and obesity. While many people believe that a higher tax scheme should be imposed to tackle this trend, I disagree with this view because of several reasons.
Firstly, imposing a higher tax might prevent the middle-income and the poor from consuming, however, this idea would be counterproductive to the busy. Even though the costs of fast food are grossly inflated, being recorded double or even triple than the average costs of local food in Vietnam, the busy still opts to already-made food rather than investing time in having a proper meal, due to they are lack of time to waste. Consequently, this would be hard to reduce to consumption of fast-food virtually.
Furthermore, there are some more effective and practical measures that should be considered to address this problem from both societal and governmental perspectives. Firstly, it is essential for parents to spend their time making nutritional meals for their family. This would act as a deterrent for their children and other family members to consume packaged food. Therefore, they are ensured to adopt a balanced diet, equipped with fundamental vitamins and minerals needed, which assist them in achieving and sustaining healthy conditions. Secondly, the policymakers should launch campaigns to raise their inhabitants’ awareness regarding detrimental substances contained in fast-food such as artificial additives, which undoubtedly can lead to malnutrition and life-threatening condition if used excessively. As a result, these people would be more conscious about what they consume and avoid this food.
In conclusion, it might seem sensible to me that imposing taxes on fast-food would not be effective for the busy, and there are other substantial ways to address this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- More and more people are no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news They get news from about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 84
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 84
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 67
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39455782313 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99791681108 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8659729789 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9166666667 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257130252814 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985199816629 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461311567333 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165323350504 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00647809633756 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.