In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
In this 21st century, human beings mostly prefer to eat outside : in hotels; street food, which are considered as the fast food. In some nations, the figure of people, who are facing health issues, is booming due to the adaptation of too much junk food. It is sine-qua-non for the author to add more tax upon this type of food. I partially agree with this argument.
On one hand, presently, individuals organise so many events vis-á-vis the past : birthday party; marriage anniversary; after any achievement and so on, where the take fast food, accordingly, they get some health problems instead of vitamins : fever, food poison. In order to tackle the issue government ought to impose a higher levy on the convenience food, it helps to decline the number of mankind, who are suffering from health issue. For an instance, one of the african countries - Mauritius, which is preeminent as the tourist nation, where the highest number of junk food is consumed, on account of that, the poor health cases are increased, to solve the problem author added some taxes upon fast food, which made people to less eat outside food after that the cases of health issues are day by day decreased.
On the other hand, in many nations, the business of fast food has been playing a vital role for the country as well as citizens. If the government should raise the taxes upon convenience food, it will have bad impact on both public and nation. For an example, one of the asian countries - Thailand, where author applied too much levy upon junk meals to solve the issue, accordingly, human beings stop to eat junk food owing to that not only hotels' income was falling down but also the economy of the country.
To conclude, as long as government incline the taxes, it assists to deal with the issues of health, however, it affects the income of individuals and nation as well because the business of fast food is only means for earning money for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- The Pie Charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 67
- Some people work for the sum Organisation all their working life other think that it is a better to work for different organisation discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 87
- Many people use customer reviews on the Internet to make decisions about what they buy Are customer reviews the most useful tool to use when making a purchase 72
- The table below shows Top 10 countries with largest population in 2019 and how it is projected to change by 2100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hotels'' or 'hotel's'?
Suggestion: hotels'; hotel's
...to eat junk food owing to that not only hotels income was falling down but also the ec...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75667655786 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43967784234 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540059347181 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.7658991396 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.727272727 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6363636364 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398714272105 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153373571684 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414040270539 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236741696632 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666887200488 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.