Some people think high-end technology can prevent and cut down the rate of committing crime. Do you agree or disagree?
The advanced technology has been being ubiquitous element for the mankind in this contemporary era. Many technocrats perceive that the utilization of the expensive technology in substantive way could curtail the potential delinquencies. Apropos to the statement, I partially agree with it.
To commence, the proportion of the offences has been increased exorbitantly owing to lack of supervision by an individual on imperative areas and objects. By using CCTV- closed circuit television cameras, which is expensive gadget for digital surveillance could conductively impede criminal activities: burglary in resident area and robbery on streets. Moreover, there are multitudinous artificial intelligent gadgets and softwares have been developed, which are proactive to send alarming signals to the appropriate receiver about suspicious activities in the premises. For an example, the Indian government portals on the internet are shielded with anti-hacking softwares to mitigate the episodes of cybercrimes, likewise all the administrative buildings consists of CCTV cameras to protect the eminent things. Although, these high-tech technological products are expensive, they would prevent the episodes of crime as well as ameliorate the security of personals and their respective properties.
On the other hand, the high-end technology is not only the solution to curb the crime rate. Notwithstanding the indulgence of enhanced gadgets in security, the culprit can easily manipulate them with their dexterity. Hence, the persistent involvement of human being is sine qua non in order to avert evil-doers in every aspects. Furthermore, the high-ended technology could be used by the delinquents to commit their crime with minimal efforts. To exemplify, in last decade, the online deceives have been burgeoning due to avail high-tech computers to hackers in all over the world, which could not be assuaged by any other expensive softwares or electronic gadgets.
To recapitulate, the proliferating criminal incidents are the prime concern for the developed society. The sagacious implementation of innovative technology could slow down the rate of misdeeds, however, other implications of it could not be overlooked. The authority must have to conduct decisive steps to prevent the soaring offences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-07 | adipiramdhan | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | MAHIR VHORA | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-22 | minhha | 73 | view |
- the maps below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 73
- Some people argue that arts such as paintings and music are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can government take to discourage people from using their cars 73
- In the past when students did a University degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
- The table below shows Top 10 countries with largest population in 2019 and how it is projected to change by 2100 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ify, in last decade, the online deceives have been burgeoning due to avail high-t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, so, well, as to, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81360946746 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23224953624 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618343195266 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0287828384 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8125 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167212012653 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557761282357 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715514758889 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956047110455 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046566287537 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.