In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In some countries, a large amount of consumption of junk foods continuously grows up to a certain extent. While a great deal of people hold the view that government should take action and come up with a solution through ascending tax revenues on this category, I firmly believe that this statement has both opposite aspects because of numberous following reasons.
On the one hand, consumers are motivated to avoid cultivating this bad habit. In more detail, it is a common knowledge that eating a very amount of fast foods gives rise in health risks and effortlessly goes down with deadly health associating with cancers and heart diseases because of its harmful ingredients. In addition, taking example of chips and fried chickens, they which involves too much fat due to being fried several times results in obesity.
On the other hand, this trend takes sellers at a disadvantage. If this problem can be truly resolved by the increase in tax also equaling to surge of cost, the fewer customers need meeting demand. For example, the market needs are less making sellers impossible to maintain their jobs. On the other words, there is not a significant number of buyers, so they can not make profits and even bankrupt.
To sum up, although higher tax revenues helps people hooked on junk foods can break this bad habit, it makes the sellers impossible to pay for a living . For these reasons, higher tax is not immensely reasonable way to plummet the deadly rate and life expectancy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-13 | ngannguyen2408 | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | Geet@3 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-09 | Linh Nguyen Phan | 61 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants Summarise the information by selecting and r 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e sellers impossible to pay for a living . For these reasons, higher tax is not im...
^^
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et the deadly rate and life expectancy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, for example, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90873015873 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59741241743 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662698412698 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6625029827 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.454545455 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282454772392 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869847328296 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480039590249 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154366459271 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306764975574 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.