In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In an accelerating pace of life nowadays, the rate of people who prefer eating fast food to home-made food is on the increase. However, people have been arguing that young generations are experiencing numerous health issues due to the excess consumption of fast food. Therefore, there has been heated debate whether or not policymakers should levy a higher tax to reduce the expenditure on this detrimental product. This writing will discuss both advantages and disadvantages of tax policy imposed on fast food prior to reaching the reasoned conclusion.
There is a widespread belief that a higher tax is essential to cut down the number of residents buying fast food. A harmful effect of junk food on human being’s health is one of the most important reasons for governments to increase the price of this food. Specifically, fast food is prepared with low-quality ingredients and contains artificial preservatives, which results in poor nutrition along with poor health. One research has shown that countries such as the USA, Canada, China that consume the most fast food throughout the world are suffering from myriad health problems, namely obesity, diabetes, high cholesterol, stroke, heart diseases and so forth. Moreover, this amount of taxes can help fund the public services, healthcare systems, etc. As a result, levying tax can be a positive approach to hamper the negative outcomes of eating fast-food products.
There are those who contend that increasing tax on fast food has some merits on the surface. Indeed, higher price of junk food may place a financial burden on the citizens, especially students who have less earnings. Because high school and university students are the main customer groups of fast food restaurants, higher taxes on fast food make them pay more money for their meals. Additionally, in the modern life of 21st century, almost everyone is busy and has no time to cook at home; therefore, fast food is a primary solution for many households due to its convenience. Take, for instance, college students or office workers prefer buying fast food near their schools or workplaces to waiting half an hour for their healthy meals in their lunch time. Consequently, a new tax policy on fast food is inappropriate method in the long term.
In conclusion, imposing a greater amount of tax on fast-food products can decrease the number of buyers, thus preventing many diseases. However, it is not a good choice for the long time, as it may lead to extra daily expenses. Hence, it is recommended that other nutritious food should be made cheaper and more convenient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Sakil | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | xa1en | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | Hieutrungnguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | nhaothuy | 67 | view |
- The graph below gives information on wages of some country over a ten year period. 84
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2016 and future projections for 2025 92
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...Therefore, there has been heated debate whether or not policymakers should levy a higher tax t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun earnings is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... citizens, especially students who have less earnings. Because high school and unive...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.28125 0.247107183377 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.135416666667 0.155533422707 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.120833333333 0.0946595960268 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.05 0.0501214627716 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.01875 0.0437548338989 43% => OK
Prepositions: 0.1125 0.122226691241 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0458333333333 0.0403226058552 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81438463469 2.80594681477 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0229166666667 0.0326793684256 70% => OK
Particles: 0.00208333333333 0.00163938923432 127% => OK
Determiners: 0.0854166666667 0.0861772015684 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0166666666667 0.021408717616 78% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0104166666667 0.011925033212 87% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2607.0 1933.35771543 135% => OK
No of words: 426.0 316.048096192 135% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11971830986 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20517956788 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37558685446 0.374742101984 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.267605633803 0.28420135186 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.206572769953 0.203846283523 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140845070423 0.137316102897 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81438463469 2.80594681477 100% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.037074148 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568075117371 0.56093040696 101% => OK
Word variations: 67.8029173134 60.7387585426 112% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4210526316 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9207664008 49.517814964 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.210526316 127.492653851 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4210526316 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.684210526316 0.814263465372 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 49.1816160119 49.1944974215 100% => OK
Elegance: 2.15306122449 1.69124875643 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449893967144 0.332605444948 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0878168805515 0.102741220458 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0409873804285 0.0668466124924 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.500808410525 0.534860350844 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0820798843835 0.148594505496 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17598018131 0.134430193775 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070145486242 0.0742795772207 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.404762823011 0.324371583561 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.068029113776 0.0638462369009 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322332011666 0.228012699653 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409175181144 0.058150111329 70% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.5751503006 272% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.4468937876 163% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.