In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Junk foods have been increasingly popular as well as a threat for youngsters. Having too much of fast food has resulted in numerous health problems hence necessary measures have to be taken to reduce consumption of junk foods. This essay will argue why Junk food is not good for health and necessary steps that can be taken to lower consumption of junk foods.
Fast foods have immensely grown in many areas and is available at any time when needed. A vast number of chemicals such as ajinamoto, gulmar etc are being used as ingredients in preparation. They also use many pre-cooked dishes includes with additives. Consuming too much fast foods can cause many health problems like diabetes, hypertension etc. A recent survey states that 70 percent of teenagers are obese due to unhealthy eating habits. Hence fast food put at increasing risk of life threating conditions.
On the other hand, the government should create awareness and make necessary measures to lessen the practice of eating unhealthy foods. One major step that can be implemented is imposing taxes on restaurants and shops that serve fast food. In this way, it could reduce the number of people consuming fast foods on a regular basis. For example, when GST was implemented in India there has been a decline in the number of people who take fast food. Therefore necessary steps should be taken by governments to ensure control over unhealthy food.
This essay argued why the government should get involved in public health concerns and why junk foods should be avoided. In my opinion, consumption of fast food is an unhealthy practice and should be avoided in order to maintain a healthy lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Sakil | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | xa1en | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | Hieutrungnguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | nhaothuy | 67 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010. 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Mass media plays an important role in peoples ideas. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e obese due to unhealthy eating habits. Hence fast food put at increasing risk of lif...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...he number of people who take fast food. Therefore necessary steps should be taken by gove...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98928571429 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.629481112 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1129341589 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.3125 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328932855825 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113774096102 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591800492708 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199814790807 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542526728968 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.