In contemporary society, with the development of internet, people have more access to educational resources. As a result, some people chose to educate their children at home rather than send them to school. From my perspective, such approach exerts more positive impact on children .
The most distinct merit is that education at home can keep children from bullying, and offer them a better and safer learning environment. According to a survey, 77% of students are bullied mentally, verbally, and physically. 8% of students miss 1 day of class per month for fear of bullies. From these statistics, we can clearly see the harm which school bullying causes to children‘s academy and health. On the contrary, study at home can minimize the occurrence of school bullying, so they can focus more on their study.
Another merit is study at home can offer students conveniences and flexibility，especially for gifted students. self -paced education allow them to study courses ahead of their level and they can finish compulsory education much earlier rather than being restricted by school education.
But we can’t deny that education at home still has some demerits. Since children’s parents are usually not professional teachers, so they may fail to give children comprehensive coverage of knowledge. Apart from that, children have less opportunities to communicate with others and this may cause social disorder. But these demerits pale in comparison to the merits.
In conclusion, even though family education is not conducive to children's integration into society, i still believe education at home can keep children from school bullying and can satisfy the needs and capabilities of talented students. And in this fast-pasted, hi-tech dominated society, family education can conform the trend of social development.
- Many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks? 61
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world spends numerous government expenditures This money should be use in new housing and road development To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? (Study Sample) 67
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 78
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... exerts more positive impact on children . The most distinct merit is that educ...
^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d offer them a better and safer learning environment. According to a survey, 77% ...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Self
...ibility，especially for gifted students. self -paced education allow them to study co...
^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...owledge. Apart from that, children have less opportunities to communicate with other...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, apart from, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51056338028 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15976552773 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8334472036 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305026358574 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108419607554 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116115296957 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189778862807 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471165078111 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.