As companies require experienced employees, they should hire applicants without going beyond the scope of the law. There are legal restrictions against denying a CV in regards with applicant's age. Although, this might facilitate employement rate. I believe that it will have negative impact on a company's productivity in the long term.
Many firms operate under government law, so they select applicants based on age. And the recruitment of job seekers focus on their age will definitely work in favor of the company. The accepted applicants may be suitable for the work place in all aspects, will have enough involvement and a good understanding of modern technology. Moreover, they can aid their office to develop well even later.
However, employement of applicants by age also have negative impact. The working capacity of people in different ages varies, too. For instance, olders may have more experience and youngs may have knowledge belonged to technology. But job applicants who selected for age, may not show the expected result. Consequently, the level of productivity falls. In this case, company could come across huge losses. Even it could not provide its staff with a sufficient salary.
In conclusion, even though there are lawful rules in contrast to rejecting job applicant's age, and it may help employment growth. I think that there will be bad influence on the production of the company in the long period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ng a CV in regards with applicants age. Although, this might facilitate employement rate...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompanys productivity in the long term. Many firms operate under government ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate under government law, so they select applicants based on age. And the recruit...
^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...table for the work place in all aspects, will have enough involvement and a good ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir office to develop well even later. However, employement of applicants by...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries, too. For instance, olders may have more experience and youngs may have know...
^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...applicants who selected for age, may not show the expected result. Consequently, ...
^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not provide its staff with a sufficient salary. In conclusion, even though ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its staff with a sufficient salary. In conclusion, even though there are law...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re lawful rules in contrast to rejecting job applicants age, and it may help empl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21645021645 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84654337184 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627705627706 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2548951572 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.8823529412 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5882352941 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17193886522 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549334714332 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467210372364 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109384809675 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174409156833 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.