In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
“A skillful and experienced employee is an asset of a company”
The growth of the company depends on the employee. The company who has understood this fact has started investing on their employees to increase the turnover and thus boost the economy. However, the selection criteria for an applicant can restrict the recruitment of a skillful and valuable person in the company. In this essay I am going to discuss about positive development of company by not rejecting the applicant based on his/her age.
Firstly, skills cannot be assessed or speculated on age basis. For instance: a person might have 5-7 years of experience in a discipline but that does not ensure that he knows in and out about the job. I believe that the ability to complete a job with perfection does not only depend on the amount of years you have spent in a company, but it depends how passionate and dedicated you are towards the job. The same job can be accomplished by a person who has been unemployed for 8 years and know how precious that job is. he might do the job with perfection and have a greater output.
Secondly, discrimination on age basis is unfair at work force. No one should have right to judge the capability of a person based on his age. This is not only inhuman but shows lack of professionalism as well. If Mark Zuckerberg was judged for his age, Facebook would have been the topic or theme for sci-fi movies only.
I would like to conclude that rejecting an applicant because of the age is unethical and is a negative development. If we want to empower the right skill in the workforce to boost the economy, such prejudice should be made illegal.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-16 | Dheeraj0809 | 61 | view |
2019-12-21 | hungdung2507 | 78 | view |
2019-11-23 | Neha1784 | 61 | view |
2019-03-27 | Narang | 73 | view |
2018-09-07 | RockyGagKy | 96 | view |
- Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers. Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 11
- Wealth does not necessarily guaranty happiness.To what extent do you agree with this statement?Provide reasons for your answer. Include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- Some people believe that a greater difference in age between parents and children is more beneficial than less of a difference. Do you think the advantages of a greater age difference outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- 1.Some people believe that a greater difference in age between parents and children is more beneficial than less of a difference. Do you think the advantages of a greater age difference outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers. Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 523, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ars and know how precious that job is. he might do the job with perfection and ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70648464164 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74882842849 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546075085324 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.918288151 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240493994919 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747959419787 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634181685338 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106352200549 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565920909117 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.