In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Refusing to job applications due to age criteria is regarded as illicit as a part of the law in some countries. From my perspective, despite the undesirable effects that come from this regulation, I think that this development would be beneficial to both individuals and society as well.
It is undeniable that this law would be unfavorable for the new generations and companies. Firstly, specific jobs, like construction workers, electricians, firefighter are examples of jobs that require specialized skills and physical conditions, which are suitable for only some age groups. Being involved in such jobs would take away students’ time for studying, or eventually labor injuries for them. Secondly, although skills and knowledge increase as people get older, the elderly do not seem able to achieve such efficiency, which can result in losing profits for the employers or companies themselves.
However, apart from the concerns mentioned above, prohibiting age discrimination in job applicants would then offer a myriad of advantages. The law would change the status of age discrimination in jobs, where employers can see what younger and older workers can do. Thus, prominent children with brilliant skills and knowledge that they acquired from reading books, or from the Internet would be able to show off themselves in the labor market, where they can widen their horizons and experience real life. Moreover, the regulation would also prevent some employers that refuse applications based on age assumption, where they would have to consider other requirements such as qualifications or working capacity. In this way, more people would be employed, allowing the society to prosper.
In conclusion, forbidding employers’ rejection of job inquiries due to candidates not being in required age groups would have positive effects on both people and the whole community although it would have some adverse effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Dheeraj0809 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | hungdung2507 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Neha1784 | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Narang | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-07 | RockyGagKy | 96 | view |
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The power of modern devices lies in their ability to allow us to connect but at the same time disconnect with each other We now have more relationships online but at the same time less relationships offline In your opinion does technology bring us closer 78
- In the past sports champions used to be motivated by the desire to win a match or to break the world records These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous What message does this send to young people and ho 84
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school, some people believe that this has negative development while others think there are some benefits. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 84
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, apart from, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51342281879 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05313255454 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587248322148 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0834617359 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.916666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170173989029 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701496911052 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333681995881 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119115449866 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333484162261 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.