In some countries, more and more adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Modern societies are witnessing a surge in the number of people choosing to stay close to their parents despite having graduated and attained a career. Prevalent as this trend becomes, it still lies at the center of a constant debate. From my perspective, such living conditions only spell trouble for both the adults and their parents alike. To illustrate this, the essay hereunder will delineate both the negative impact of the generation gap as well as the intrusion of parental privacy arisen during such co-habitation.
To embark with, the generation gap may take a toll on parents and their children alike. The major culprit behind this is the conservative nature of the elderly people, which exists in stark contrast with the outgoing younger citizens. As a consequence, discourse between these two groups prove inevitable during a co-habitation. To make matters worse, once common ground cannot be sought, this generation gap can even wreak havoc on the relationship between family members. Ergo, people's choice to live with their seniors after landing a job deserves some serious contemplation.
Another aspect worth considering is that those adults may encroach on their parents' life unintentionally yet perniciously. For instance, old people's propensity towards sleeping early in the evening can be negatively impacted by the youth's penchant for late parties. This paradox of time clearly takes a heavy toll on the physical health of elderly people who crave for a good night's sleep. As such life patterns continue into the future, chronic health problems prove foreseeable. This given example serves as a testament to another downside of the co-habitation in question.
To recapitulate, adults' choice to stay with their parents after working should not be welcomed due to the differences between generations and an intrusion of old people's privacy. To ameliorate this circumstance, I suggest working people settling down elsewhere for the sake of both themselves and their birthgivers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...e negative impact of the generation gap as well as the intrusion of parental privacy arise...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youths'' or 'youth's'?
Suggestion: youths'; youth's
...ening can be negatively impacted by the youths penchant for late parties. This paradox...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39171974522 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90714096999 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62101910828 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5935425172 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165631795232 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055053859737 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568755875976 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102978631192 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028931176079 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...e negative impact of the generation gap as well as the intrusion of parental privacy arise...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youths'' or 'youth's'?
Suggestion: youths'; youth's
...ening can be negatively impacted by the youths penchant for late parties. This paradox...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39171974522 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90714096999 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62101910828 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5935425172 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165631795232 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055053859737 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568755875976 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102978631192 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028931176079 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.