In modern times, a large number of people are trying to figure out the past of houses, which they are planning to purchase or own. There is a reason for this trend and several methods to obtain the information about the house that they wanted.
To begin with, Superstition plays a vital role on why people are investigating about the history of their future home. Some countries around the world believe in supernatural phenomenan, where they perform rituals to cleanse away bad luck. This has led to numerous people to find out the history of their house to see, whether the house that they are going to purchase had some one passed away in it or not. For instance, in Vietnam, it is considered a bad omen to own a house that the occupant recently passed away, and many Vietnamese people will ask a monk or a priest, which will depends on their religion, to come to the house and cleanse the bad omen away.
However, there are several ways for people to check and research about the house or building they are planning to own. Firstly, realestate news can be a good source to find out the history of a particular building, and find out more information about it such as the price and neighborhood. Secondly, there is a website for people to check more detail information of a building. This can help buyers to filter out houses that does not meet their standards. In Vietnam, for example, we have website to help people find houses and information about the building that they are interested in. Finally, realestate agents can help people know more about the realestate that they want to own. The agents, who are equiped with information and knowledge about the house, can help buyers with any questions that they have.
In conclusion, a number of people are wanting to investigate about the history of their future home. Superstition played an important role in this trend and there are several ways to obtain information about the house they wanted.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- At present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of old people Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In their advertising business nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
In modern times, a large number of people are trying to figure out the pas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 373, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...use that they are going to purchase had some one passed away in it or not. For instance,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...tate that they want to own. The agents, who are equiped with information and knowledge ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ave. In conclusion, a number of people are wanting to investigate about the history of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72514619883 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5198504013 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43567251462 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4519802502 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464013586089 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167286365879 0.084324248473 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695270330891 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271107656884 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855163224962 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.