In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation

Essay topics:

In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people.

Why might this be the case?
Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

People, nowadays, need secure life with their household for future. Many countries people thinking that living in own home is important than renting. In my point of view, having own home is an identity for household.

In this case, people often find a permanent place, where they could live a secured life with their family. Therefore, household has to be a home by ownership or heir, that will be convenient status in society. Some countries, however, cultures have been followed by giving houses for newly married couples. For example, in South Kore, they have a cultural view, that is recent married couples should live in their own home, that is why they provides home before getting married or buy one. They think having own home is domestic way to present a family.

On the other hand, I think this is a positive impact for our society and culture, because living under own roof is far better than rental home. Rental apartment or home is not permanent place to live, while having own house, nobody would have to leave it. To illustrate, if people living for a long time in a home, they do not wish to leave it, while it is not their own, that is why having own accommodation has impact to live long life. For example, I know my friend Rifat was living an apartment in the city, and at a time they moved to country side with family, but without home has to pay rent. For this reasons people who rent home could not stay longer one place.

In conclusion, having own home is behalf of living peaceful life than renting home or room, and people intend to live their own house, because living in a rental place has no positive view.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-19 hahoaan 67 view
2024-08-18 Tuan Harry 84 view
2023-12-24 Daniel3003 73 view
2023-12-24 Daniel3003 67 view
2023-12-24 Daniel3003 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...ive in their own home, that is why they provides home before getting married or buy one....
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57966101695 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23943399916 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522033898305 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0994366226 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314336713833 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131524367228 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733757199552 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211762582376 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408238334886 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.