In some countries people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the ampunt people can earn.
There are some conflicted views about high salaries earned by employees, as others argue, that it is good for the development of the nation, whilst some think that the policy makers should control salaries, as well as limiting the amount of money earned by citizens.
A motivated employee is an asset for the company. There are lots of things that motivates workers, chief among them is salary payment. High salary payment aid in retaining hard workers and promote company's productivity. For example, when people choose a career they usually consider the salary scale, as there are basic needs and wants that needs to be addressed. Failure by employees to cater their needs and wants at their home can result in boredom, as well as, absenteeism at work. The prosperity of the company or industry boast the economy of a country.
Furthermore, high salary promote health of the nation. People will afford to buy food stuffs suitable for body building, loaded with all nutritional requirements for a person. For instance, underdeveloped countries pay people less as they cannot afford to buy fruits as they consider them to be luxurious, as they afford to buy basic food stuffs only. Therefore, it is beneficial for the country, to have workers paid high salaries as this cut health wage bill for treatment of nutritional deficiency diseases.
However, the government should control the salary threshold for employees, especially in cases where top management is overpaid at the cost of low-level employees. Grading of staff should be done and paid accordingly. For example, if the top management is highly paid, they will not feel the heat of the economy which affect lower level workers in their decision-making.
In conclusion, it is of importance for workers to be paid highly, though it has to be fairly distributed among top management and low-level employees. A standard grading system might be of help to make sure justice and fairness between employees and those in managerial positions.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-01 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
2019-12-22 | xa1en | 73 | view |
2019-12-02 | Hira Shaheen | 73 | view |
2019-12-02 | Hira Shaheen | 73 | view |
2019-11-22 | Javzaa | 56 | view |
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The bar chart below shows figures of annual coffee and meat consumption. 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories, from 1995-2004. 56
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2000 and 2010, and by level of education for the year 2002 and 2010 67
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by a car. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cted views about high salaries earned by employees, as others argue, that it is g...
^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to cater their needs and wants at their home can result in boredom, as well as, ...
^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity of the company or industry boast the economy of a country. Furthermore, ...
^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...nderdeveloped countries pay people less as they cannot afford to buy fruits as the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15902140673 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79667913952 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544342507645 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2584481663 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4375 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284234837574 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077566732921 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827717019448 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151685926193 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117611885861 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.