Some devices have put all of the world’s information at our fingertips. The benefits of this development are obvious, but what are the drawbacks?
The advent of smart gadgets marked the commencement of a new era - the Information Age. While these modern devices have opened up the opportunities for people to get access to the limitless source of information and brought about huge benefits, they are not without drawbacks. Analysing the threats posed on our privacy and the possible degradation of our recollection will show this.
The advancement of smart devices entails the birth of the Internet which, in some ways, puts our privacy at stake. In 2018, Facebook - a social media giant was accused of leaking its users’ personal information to other corporations for the purpose of advertising. This has alarmed netizens as the whole about the insecurity in this virtual environment where individual data can be sold like a product. In this sense, living in a world of information is not really a positive thing.
Another demerit of these state-of-the-art devices is its potential menace to our memory. As people can search for information just through a click of a mouse, they tend to overly rely in these gadgets. For example, online Wikipedia was devised to meet the demand for news and data, however, it turns out to be detrimental to our memory’s ability due to our overdependence on it for information without remembering it ourselves. Beside that, an unfortunate trend of this useful web is that it can serve as a fraudulent tool manipulated by students to cheat in the exams.
As the above has made clear, modern devices can be demeritorious in the manner it makes threats against our privacy as well as how it is used for negative purposes. By now, it is highly recommended that we should not only take advantage of these technological advances but at the same time, know how to avoid the dangers mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | TranPhuongThao250403 | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Reza_omniscient | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Reza_omniscient | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Reza_omniscient | 78 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
- That many students are far too dependent on computers for their study may have some negative effects. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
- International migration in UK 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly in these gadgets. For example, online Wikipedia was devised to meet the demand...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, really, so, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97666666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98215531052 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9769444177 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.846153846 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232459222174 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790675420587 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475267552582 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137539294593 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616800209809 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.