Some people believe that schools are no longer necessary, because children can get so much information through the internet and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
People’s opinions differ as to whether Internet-based study can replace school curriculum. There are many ifs and buts in this argument, however, from my own perspective, online learning can have both advantages and disadvantages and the latter far outweigh the former.
On the one hand, e-schooling can bring about, among many others, three benefits. This first and also the most important is its rich data sources. Online students are likely to be exposed to a wide variety of study materials from all over the world and thus gain a profound knowledge in all areas of study. Personalized learning process is another merit of online course. Each student follows a particular mode of instruction. Traditional classroom learning is normally designed to meet the needs of most of the students without considering their ability and interests which, in the long run, produces a less effective outcome than that of its online counterpart. Last but not least, for the flexible nature of online curriculum, one can study whenever and wherever they want. As everyone’s schedule is different, this feature probably helps online course members who do not usually have time for study.
On the other hand, this innovative teaching method has two main drawbacks. To commence with, students who study online tend to lack human interaction with other course members and teachers, which was in the past believed to increase the effectiveness of classroom learning, amongst least confident students. Uncensored content is to be taken into consideration as it can have negative impact on students and impede their study progression.
To sum up, after having already weighed up the pros and cons of online learning, the discussion above indicates that their merits outnumber their demerits. Therefore, it is highly recommended that online students should make the full use of online courses’ potentials as well as mitigate their shortcomings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-11 | JoNy1996 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | TranPhuongThao250403 | 89 | view |
- the diagram below shows how salt is removed from seawater to make it drinkable 11
- Some devices have put all of the world’s information at our fingertips. The benefits of this development are obvious, but what are the drawbacks? 89
- That many students are far too dependent on computers for their study may have some negative effects. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
People's opinions differ as to whether Internet-based study can replace school...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'profound knowledge'.
Suggestion: profound knowledge
...s from all over the world and thus gain a profound knowledge in all areas of study. Personalized lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'amongst the least'.
Suggestion: amongst the least
...he effectiveness of classroom learning, amongst least confident students. Uncensored content ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36721311475 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92707018277 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63606557377 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3944047658 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.133333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107441279047 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401644555774 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525230814341 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720057333445 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450939911447 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.