Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.
Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate and reach a conclusion.
For many employers, granting gyms or sports clubs membership is a good way to enhance their employees’ productivity. While some people agree that this may lead to better output at work, others think that it is fruitless. This essay will discuss the two opposing sides before reaching a conclusion.
On the one hand, health-based incentives appear to be a good way to help both employers and their staff. Going to gyms center or playing a certain kind of sport can improve employees’ physical health and thus their work can be improved profoundly. Additionally, by focusing on staff’s well-being, the company can be regarded as an ideal place to work for as it means that they do not only concentrate on revenue, but also care about people who work for them. This can be a factor that helps attract new talents to come and devote to the company. Moreover, in the long run, if the entire company is in good health, their business will inevitably thrive.
However, it is not a good move financially, while there are many other ways to allocate their budgets. Firstly, it would be difficult to control the efficacy of the practice because knowing if the employees work-out or not is not an easy task so to quantify the effectiveness of the measure is almost impossible. Besides, some employees might even find that it is a burden if not an extra task from their managers. This, accumulated over time, can build up resentment so instead of being motivated, those employees might lose their enthusiasm and their interest at work. It would be more efficient if companies invest in some financial incentives such as pay increments, perks or some in the job training so that their workers could achieve better career progression.
In conclusion, while for some companies, subsidising healthy pursuits might be superficially attractive, there are more practical and measurable ways to improve the performance of their workforce.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-13 | Nareia | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-02 | samdilnura | view | |
| 2021-04-30 | samdilnura | 50 | view |
| 2021-04-30 | samdilnura | view | |
| 2021-03-04 | Kathleen_119 | 84 | view |
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 84
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work Other employers see no benefit in doing so Consider the arguments from both aspects of 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03115264798 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8623401509 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591900311526 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7110090594 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.357142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318017297346 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106700290953 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451846814739 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183244560505 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513112080889 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.