Regarding the issue of the method supervisors motivate their employees by rewarding them some bonus money, people hold different views. While I accept that giving workers extra money tends to provide benefits for them and the company, I believe that better solutions are provided for those companies to gain the contributions of the staffs.
On the one hand, I would agree that employers can keep workers trying their best for the company by awarding them with some raises in their income. Firstly, by doing this, the employees will be aware of value of their contribution to the company and keep working hard to gain more those bonuses. For example, being motivated by that extra money, staffs will have their work completed productively, which enable the company to cultivate huge profits. Secondly, some rewarding money can help those workers not only to earn a living but also to promote their living standard. If they enhance their lives, they will absorb a better health and a lucid mind, which allow those workers to work harder and more effectively. As a result, giving some extra money to employees for their distinctive contributions can mostly benefit companies.
On the other hand, I believe that there are greater solutions to encourage the staffs to work hard than rewarding money. When people do their job conscientiously, it is necessary for them they to relax and revise. The most obvious solution is to provide workers with a holiday. For instance, after gaining a vital contract for the company, employees should be awarded with a vacation which help them to entertain and recover both physically and mentally. Furthermore, some individuals work hard not only for extra money but also for their personal goals. Therefore, employers should promote them to higher position, which can allow those employees to commit their loyalty to the company. Consequently, staffs can make the contribution to their company one way or another.
In conclusion, several solution for encouraging employees to dedicate for the company, employers should use those method wisely and carefully.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 56
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 78
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 78
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contributions to the company by giving them extra money. this practice can act as an incentive for some, but may also have a negative impact on others.To what extent is this style of management 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that that should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e that better solutions are provided for those companies to gain the contribution...
^^
Line 4, column 17, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun solution seems to be countable; consider using: 'several solutions'.
Suggestion: several solutions
...ny one way or another. In conclusion, several solution for encouraging employees to dedicate f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this method' or 'those methods'?
Suggestion: this method; those methods
...e for the company, employers should use those method wisely and carefully.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19526627219 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6765191519 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494082840237 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1448545721 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3125 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348022682414 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132958063444 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741573241849 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226945258639 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074902420705 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.